Sunday, August 28, 2011

Remembering Our National Heroes Day


 Photocredit: National Youth Commission

Glorious skirmishes for independence, exciting epics to pass down to our sons and daughters, and pages from history that we should take to the heart and learn from. These are the stories of our country's colorful struggle for independence and democracy - all of which were made possible by our heroes, both revered and unsung alike. They are the subjects who we should honor during our National Heroes Day. Unfortunately, it's just another weekend for most.

But more important than a passing celebration is the realization of our roles as baton carriers. Our heroes did not simply struggle and die for our freedom, they also passed down to us the responsibility of uplifting our country. 

“Mapalad ang bayang linitawan ng mga bayani, 
sapagka’t ang bayang iya’y walang kamatayan." 
(Fortunate is the country where heroes emerge 
because that country will live on)
- Andres Bonifacio

Without new heroes to replace the icons of yesterday, our country is doomed to disappear from the annals of history. The katipuneros and propagandistas of yesterday are the incorruptable policemen, noble politicians, hardworking employees, authoritative parents, and responsible students of today. This responsibility was not handed to a single successor, since we are all beneficiaries of their sacrifices. 

Admittedly, the Philippines is nowhere near the ideal land that everyone dreams to live in. Alarming poverty, dirty politics, senseless conflict - it all exists today. But without enough people who will work hand-in-hand in solving these, that dream of an ideal Philippines to live in will forever be a distant dream to chase. Rather than being reactive with complaints and opposition, it's high time that we all became proactive by playing a part in the solution. It's a daunting task that we all face as Filipinos; but it's one that will forever hound us until we muster the courage to heed its call, God forbid that it be too late. We have to remember that once upon a time, even our revered heroes were average, everyday people who just happen to come face to face with reality, but decided to do something about it.

I'm proud to consider the CSSP Student Council as passionate, responsible baton carriers.

But all is not bleak, for I found inspiration and hope in many members of the youth today. They are those who are not afraid to look at the harsh realities of life, and actually do something about it. For many, the role of baton carriers is not something easily grasped, but is done so anyway because so few take up the role. For every Iskolar ng Bayan, the moment we realize, internalize, and decide to do justice to our roles is the moment of becoming an Iskolar para sa Bayan.

In celebrating our Nation's struggle and remembering what our heroes stood for, perhaps the most important question remains: the baton has long since been passed, are you ready to accept it?

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Social Osmosis, SSP in Practice




Social Osmosis, SSP in Practice:
An Immersion Opportunity with the Ata Matigsalug People

Where:
Matigsalug Village in Tapak, Davao City


When:
October 20-28, 2011



What to do:
(1) Be one with the Ata Matigsalug People
(2) Appreciate the culture of our Indigenous People
(3) Observe and apply the Social Sciences and Philosophy Disciplines

Interested?
Contact CSSP Rep Dan Christian Ramos for the in-depth details
09053159388
09228530509
dan.ramos2@ymail.com

***this opportunity is open for ALL CSSP Students
SLOTS ARE VERY LIMITED


Brought to you by:
CSSP Representative to the USC
Core Alliance of Representatives (CALLREP)
iEmergence

Saturday, August 20, 2011

UP the Budget! UP deserves better!


***Taken from http://www.facebook.com/notes/cssp-student-council/up-the-budget-up-deserves-better/197973060266741




For the past few years, economic data show trends of low priority for education in the country as reflected by the usage of only meager percentages of the gross national product (GNP), far below what is recommended by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Delors Benchmark of 6%. This year, the situation remains the same – P241.1 billion or only 2.5% of the GNP is allotted to education. Without even looking beyond the University of the Philippines, the country’s national university, we are allocated only a small fraction of what was proposed by the UP Board of Regents, the University’s highest policymaking body. From the P17.1 billion recommendation for 2012, we are only given P5.54 billion by the Department of Budget and Management. This budget for UP is P208.2M or 3.6% lower than last year’s budget after going through the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is the deteriorating situation of education today in the Philippines.

Aside from the state of education in the country in general and even closer to the students of the College of Social Sciences and Philosophy (CSSP), it has been a glaring fact that the government gives unreasonably low priority for the fields in the College, namely, anthropology, demography, geography, history, linguistics, philosophy, political science, psychology, and sociology. The President’s Proposed Budget Highlights stipulate that the curricula of SUCs will focus on priority areas for economic development such as business process outsourcing, tourism, agriculture and fisheries, and infrastructure development. While economic development is indeed important especially for a developing nation like ours, development in the social, cultural, and political aspects must also be given due focus. This is the basic principle behind holistic national development.

The CSSP Student Council - the duly elected representative body of the students of CSSP - and the CSSP Academic Circle - the official alliance of academic student organizations in the College - affirm and assert that quality, relevant, and accessible education is the key to alleviating the country from the ills of being an underdeveloped nation. Providing the basic social service of education for all will not only equalize socioeconomic opportunities and raise standards of living but also provide a more human and meaningful life for each Filipino. Education therefore is a key to social progress. More important than this, however, is the fact that education is a right; it does not even have to be rationalized for its goals because education should be seen as a goal in itself. Education is rightfully and justly deserved by every human individual; therefore, it is also an important aspect of social justice. In fact, it is mandated by the 1987 Philippine Constitution that education at all levels as a right should be protected and promoted by government (1987 Constitution: Art. XIV, Sec. 1; italicization added) and that education should be given the highest budgetary priority (1987 Constitution: Art. XIV, Sec. 5).

This value for education must not and cannot be selective. We believe that all levels of education must be given equal support and priority, from the preparatory to the tertiary, as well as the technical. Beyond being mandated by the Constitution, support for one educational level without the other will lead to gaping inefficiencies, professional voids, and lack of educational fulfillment. While the foundation at the first few years of education is important, the final years must also be taken into account for the holistic development of a person. Thus, with the fact that the country’s SUCs are supposed to be government-supported, there is no reason for the government’s lack of investment in these public higher educational institutions (HEIs). Indeed, privatization of education in the country is evident in various trends, most fundamentally portrayed by the data showing that there are 1573 private higher educational institutions in the country compared to only 110 SUCs. For many Filipino high school graduates, their only option is to enroll in a public institution of higher learning. To provide even less support for SUCs is tantamount to depriving these Filipinos of their chance and opportunity for upward social mobility.

This depressing picture of low priority for SUCs is the context within which the University of the Philippines is situated. As the premier national university producing the next leaders of this country, UP must be given due attention by government. Housing numerous centers of excellence accredited by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), the University needs sufficient support from the State to maintain its tradition of honor and excellence and to continue serving the needs of the Filipino nation. A walk into any campus of the University will orient anyone to the unjust situation in UP: from deteriorating armchairs to dilapidated buildings, from outdated equipment to unsafe environments exemplified most recently by the fire that engulfed the Chemistry Pavilion at Palma Hall, from underpaid faculty members to contractual non-teaching staff laborers unable to support their families, from students subjected to the faulty socialized tuition program to deserving high school graduates who ultimately opt out of UP because of high tuition fees. It is clear that the University deserves better.

Finally, the administration and our legislators must also understand that development is not merely economic but also social, cultural, psychological, ethical, and political. Unfettered industrialization focused only on the economy can possibly hinder real societal improvement. Development must be complemented by, for examples, anthropological understanding for indigenous cultures, a demographic assessment of the population geographical value for territorial integrity, historical admiration for nationalism, linguistic respect for the country’s polyglot characteristic, philosophically grounded ethics in this rapidly changing world, institutional reform based on the principles of political science, psychological comprehension of the Filipino mind, and a sociological imagination of social statistical trends. Indeed, the state must learn to prioritize social sciences and philosophy.

On these bases, the CSSP Student Council and the CSSP Academic Circle launch UP the Budget! UP deserves better! - a campaign for higher budgets for education in general, state universities and colleges, the University of the Philippines System, and the fields of social sciences and philosophy. Among the efforts being undertaken are:


  • Online video lobbying through social networking sites. You may access the video via http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=fil&v=c58jOq9jyQE. Legislators who have responded and pledged support as of 20 August 2011 include:
  1. Rep. Pablo John Garcia
  2. Rep. JV Ejercito
  3. Rep. Amang Magsaysay
  4. Rep. Kimi Cojuangco
  5. Rep. Mercedes Alvarez
  • Sending of the CSSP Student Council’s position paper to members of the House of Representatives Committee on Higher and Technical Education. Recipients of the position paper are:
  1. Rep. Oscar Malapitan
  2. Rep. Pangalian Balindong
  3. Rep. Josefina Joson
  4. Rep. Emil Ong
  5. Rep. Eric Singson Jr.
  6. Rep. Mark Llandro Mendoza
  7. Rep. Teddy Brawner
  8. Rep. Romeo Jalosjos Jr.
  9. Rep. Dakila Carlo Cua
  10. Rep. Kaka Bag-ao
  11. Rep. Ma. Georgina De Venecia
  12. Rep. Nur Jaafar
  13. Rep. Josephine Veronique Lacson-Noel
  14. Rep. Joseph Emilio Abaya
  15. Rep. Jonathan Cabilao Yambao
  16. Rep. Narciso Bravo Jr.
  17. Rep. Jocelyn Limkaichong
  18. Rep. Joseph Gilbert Violago
  19. Rep. Ma. Rachel Arenas
  20. Rep. Anna York Bondoc
  21. Rep. Cesar Sarmiento
  22. Rep. Romeo Acop
  23. Rep. Eulogio Magsaysay
  24. Rep. Alfredo Garbin Jr.
  • Signature campaign for a petition to be sent to House representatives and senators. You may access the petition via:

http://www.petitiononline.com/upbudget/petition.html

    Itaas ang budget para sa edukasyon!
    Itaas ang budget para sa UP!
    Bigyang halaga ang agham panlipunan at pilosopiya!

    UP the budget! UP deserves better!


    References

    CHED. (2010, August). Information on Higher Education System. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from Republic of the Philippines Commission on Higher Education: http://202.57.63.198/chedwww/index.php/eng/Information

    DBM. (2011, July 27). Highlights of the 2012 Results-Focused Budget. Retrieved July 30, 2011, from Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines: http://www.gov.ph/downloads/2011/07jul/2012-Proposed-Budget-Highlights-BSA.pdf

    DBM. (2011, July). National Expenditure Program Year 2012: VII. Department of Education. Retrieved July 30, 2011, from Republic of the Philippines Department of Budget and Management: http://www.dbm.gov.ph/NEP2012/DEPED/DEPED.pdf

    DBM. (2011, July). National Expenditure Program Year 2012: VIII. State Universities and Colleges.Retrieved July 30, 2011, from Republic of the Philippines Department of Budget and Management: http://www.dbm.gov.ph/NEP2012/SUCS/SUCS.pdf

    DBM. (2011, July). National Expenditure Program Year 2012: XVI. I. Technical Education and Skills Development Authority. Retrieved July 30, 2011, from Republic of the Philippines Department of Budget and Management: http://www.dbm.gov.ph/NEP2012/DOLE/I.pdf